GENERAL CHEMISTRY PROBLEMS OF MEDICAL STUDENTS AND STRATEGIES FOR THEIR SOLUTION

Abdullaeva Khafiza Davronovna; Khodjaniyazov Sherjon Bekboevich

GENERAL CHEMISTRY PROBLEMS OF MEDICAL STUDENTS AND STRATEGIES FOR THEIR SOLUTION

Abdullaeva Khafiza Davronovna

Urgench branch of the Tashkent Medical Academy

Khodjaniyazov Sherjon Bekboevich

Urgench branch of the Tashkent Medical Academy

##semicolon## Medical students,##common.commaListSeparator## Chemistry

सार

This article analyzes the main problems faced by medical students in studying chemistry and ways to overcome them. The study identifies such factors as difficulties in understanding abstract concepts, lack of mathematical training, lack of interdisciplinary connections, and ineffectiveness of teaching methods as the main obstacles. The necessity of a contextual approach to problem-solving, the use of active learning methods, digital technologies, increasing motivation, and developing the teacher's pedagogical competence is proposed. The article contains strategies formed on the basis of modern pedagogical approaches and substantiated by scientific research.

##submission.citations##

1. Michael, J. (2007). What makes physiology hard for students to learn? Results of a faculty survey. Advances in Physiology Education, 31(1), 34–40.

https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00057.2006

2. Seery, M. K. (2015). Flipped learning in higher education chemistry: emerging trends and potential directions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00136F

3. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A Taxonomy of Problem-Based Learning Methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x

4. Orgill, M., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). An analysis of the effectiveness of concept maps as instructional tools in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1040–1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20126

5. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014695

6. Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90006F

7. Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014.

https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074

8. Overton, T. L., & Randles, C. A. (2015). Developing critical thinking through chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 582–594. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00136H

9. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

10. Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263350

11. Abdullaeva Hafiza Davronovna. (2025). MEDICINAL SUBSTANCES CONTAINING BIOMETALS AND THEIR APPLICATION IN MEDICINE. Next Scientists Conferences, 1(01), 87–89. Retrieved from https://nextscientists.com/index.php/science-conf/article/view/467