The Discursive Features of Speech Acts in German Media

Axmadjonov Nurbek Zokirjon o‘g‘li

The Discursive Features of Speech Acts in German Media

Axmadjonov Nurbek Zokirjon o‘g‘li

Faculty of foreign languages Associate professor of the Department of German and French languages PhD in Philosophical Sciences

##semicolon## discursive features##common.commaListSeparator## speech acts

सार

This article aims to dissect and illuminate the discursive features of speech acts in German media alongside with the comparison with those in Uzbek media. By delving into various media formats: from news reporting and political interviews to advertising and television broadcast, we explore to understand how language functions not just to convey information, but to perform actions that influence, persuade, and engage the public. In an era where media narratives hold significant sway over societal beliefs and behaviors, understanding the mechanics of speech acts becomes paramount. This exploration offers valuable insights into the strategic use of language in media, contributing to the broader field of pragmatics and enhancing our comprehension of communication dynamics in contemporary society.

##submission.citations##

1. Аdamova Hanna, Yevtimova Diana, Plokhotna Valeriia, Zahura Oksana & Chernenko Tetiana, (2022), Online Published: October 17, 2022 doi:10.5430/wjel.v12n8p212 URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p212, https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/22316/14031

2. Andreas Trotzke University of Konstanz and Laura Reimer University of Münster, Comprehending non-canonical and indirect speech acts in German, Received 29 August 2022; revised 3 November 2023; accepted 6 November 2023, doi:10.1017/S0022226723000336, https://ling.sprachwiss.uni-konstanz.de/pages/home/trotzke/download/trotzkereimer_2023%20(1).pdf

3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

4. Bystrov, Y., Mintsys, R., & Mintsys, S. (2020). Pragmatic distinctions in imperative usage: A comparative perspective. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 15(2), 145–162.

5. Condon, S. (2015). High-context cultures and linguistic structures: A study of directive speech acts. Pragmatics and Society, 6(3), 421–437

6. Chigasheva, M. A. (2017). Terminological Aspects of Political Discourse in the German Media, December 2017RUDN Journal of Language Studies Semiotics and Semantics 8(2):358-366 DOI:10.22363/2313-2299-2017-8-2-358366,https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318074561_Terminological_Aspect_of_Political_Discourse_in_the_German_Media

7. Deppermann, A. (2018). The pragmatics of directive speech acts in German: An empirical approach. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 30(4), 512–536.

8. House, J. (2012). Politeness strategies in media discourse: A cross-cultural perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics, 9(1), 67–88.

9. Jürgen Habermas (1981), in his influential work The Theory of Communicative Action, https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Theory-of-CommunicativeAction,https://teddykw2.wordpress.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/07/jurgen-habermas-theory-of-communicative-action-volume-1.pdf

10. Jürgen Habermas (1989) in The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere,https://arditiesp.wordpress.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/01/habermas_structural_transf_public_sphere.pdf

11. Karandeeva, E., Stanchuliak, O., Popova, T., Suyskaya, V., & Shvedova, A. (2020). Indirect directives in German and English: A contrastive analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 245–262.

12. Keller, R. (2011). Discourse and Pragmatics in Media Communication. Springer.

13. Lekakou, M., & Quer, J. (2016). Face-saving strategies in German media: A pragmatic analysis. Linguistics & Communication, 10(2), 175–193.

14. Lingua-Service Deaf. (2009). Changing attitudes towards directives in modern German. Language & Society, 8(1), 95–110.

15. Moessner, L. (2010). Directive speech acts and their role in news discourse. Pragmatic Perspectives, 5(4), 303–319.

16. Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., Engelmann, F., & Suckow, K. (2018). The pragmatics of imperatives in German: An experimental approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 112–130.

17. Schröder, F. (2006). Journalism and Ethics in German Media. Media Ethics Review, 10(3), 42-55, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1557915/FULLTEXT01.pdf

18. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

19. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and power in media: The role of speech acts. Critical Discourse Studies, 3(2), 89–113.

20. Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2017). Digital media and speech acts: The transformation of journalistic language. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 531–547.