FANLARARO PBL: BIOLOGIYA VA INGLIZ TILI INTEGRATSIYASI ORQALI OG’ZAKI MULOQOTNI RIVOJLANTIRISH
Anora Erkinova Akbar qizi
Qashqadaryo viloyati Kitob tumani 34-umumiy o’rta ta’lim maktabi o’qituvchisi
Keywords: integratsiya, CLIL, biologiya, ingliz tili, og’zaki muloqot, fanlararo yondashuv, kommunikativ kompetensiya.
Abstract
Ushbu tezisda biologiya fanini ingliz tili bilan integratsiyalash orqali o’quvchilarning og’zaki nutq kompetensiyasini rivojlantirish masalasi yoritilgan. Tadqiqotda integratsiyalashgan yondashuv orqali fanlararo bog’liqlikni kuchaytirish, o’quvchilarning kommunikativ ko’nikmalarini shakllantirish hamda ularning fanlarga bo’lgan qiziqishini oshirish yo’llari ko’rib chiqilgan. Ayniqsa, CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) metodikasi asosida biologik atamalarni ingliz tilida o’rgatish orqali o’quvchilarning til bilish darajasini oshirish va ilmiy ifoda qilish malakalarini rivojlantirishning afzalliklari tahlil qilingan. Shuningdek, maqolada amaliy misollar, dars ishlanmalari va integratsiyalangan topshiriqlar orqali o’quvchilarning faol og’zaki muloqotga jalb etilishi ko’rsatib berilgan. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko’rsatadiki, biologiya va ingliz tilini birgalikda o’qitish o’quvchilarda fanga nisbatan ijobiy munosabat va mustahkam til ko’nikmalarini shakllantiradi.
References
1. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
2. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204.
3. Hamdamov. E. E. The content of the language professional-gnostic training of an English teacher. Bulletin of Gulistan State University, 2021
4. Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. European Commission.
5. Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. McGraw-Hill.
6. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral Feedback in Classroom SLA: A Meta-Analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265-302.
7. Turnbull, M., & Dailey-O’Cain, J. (2009). Integrating Content and Language in Higher Education. John Benjamins Publishing.
8. Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. J. (2012). Balancing Content and Language in Instruction: The Experience of Immersion Teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251-269.
9. Stoller, F. L. (2004). Content-based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 261-283.
10. Abdisheribov, S., Yo'Ldosheva, M., & Jumayeva, M. (2022). Implementing creative writing in English language teaching classrooms. Science and innovation, 1(B8), 1343-1347.
11. Ibroximjon, M., & Mukarrama, J. (2022). Hozirgi kun yoshlarini ijtimoiy munosabatlarga kirishishida chet tillarini o'rgatilishi va uning ahamiyati. Involta Scientific Journal, 1 (5), 178-182.
12. Jumayeva, M. B. (2025). Use of educational methods in pedagogy. Икро журнал, 14(02), 168-174.
13. Mukarrama, J., Jasurbek, A., & Kamoliddin, S. (2022). Teaching listening skills in English. Academicia Globe: Inderscience Research, 3 (06), 252-255.
14. Umidjon, G., & Mukarrama, J. (2022). Used in lesson processes efficiency of interactive methods. Ta'lim va rivojlanish tahlili onlayn ilmiy jurnali, 161-162.




